When tackling the world’s most pressing challenges—like poverty, climate change, and systemic inequality—traditional monitoring and evaluation (M&E) tools often fall short. Why? Because they’re designed for linear projects with clear cause-and-effect logic, not for the messy, dynamic realities of systems change.

In their insightful article, How Evaluation Rubrics Can Help Trace Progress and Results in Complex Programs, Malene Soenderskov and Savi Mull make a powerful case for a different approach: evaluation rubrics.

Read: How evaluation rubrics can help trace progress and results in complex programs

Here’s a glimpse into what you’ll learn:

✅ Why linear M&E models don’t work for systemic change: Rigid indicators and predefined targets can’t capture shifts in power dynamics, cultural narratives, or policy landscapes.

✅ How rubrics enable nuanced, context-sensitive evaluation: By defining criteria, levels of progress, and descriptors, rubrics help organizations assess what good looks like in complex environments—and track progress along a continuum, not just a pass/fail.

✅ The power of participatory learning: Rubrics open space for multiple perspectives, foster dialogue, and support adaptive decision-making—turning compliance reporting into a meaningful learning process.

✅ Real-world examples: From Laudes Foundation to international NGOs, rubrics are helping organizations make sense of complex change and guide strategic adaptations.

Ready to rethink how you measure change in your programs?

Watch the webinar with Malene Soenderskov and Savi Mull